<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tick Talk on EsoxRepublic.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/index.php/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog</link>
	<description>I suppose this means I'm famous</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:54:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on SW2009 to introduce disappointing version of equation-driven curves by Eugene</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/05/sw2009-to-introduce-disappointing-version-of-equation-driven-curves/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 21:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/05/sw2009-to-introduce-disappointing-version-of-equation-driven-curves/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I feel your pain regarding the need for true parametric curve representation.

I am currently trying to solve a mixed parametric trig/algebraic equation with respect to x, so I can satisfy the f(x)-only requirement. It would be so much easier to just use the parametric form.

And by the way, Admin, here is an additional material to your disappointment: we can&#039;t reference dimensions within f(x) for curves.

I almost feel like doing something about it. Thoughts of API keep coming to mind...

Eugene</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel your pain regarding the need for true parametric curve representation.</p>
<p>I am currently trying to solve a mixed parametric trig/algebraic equation with respect to x, so I can satisfy the f(x)-only requirement. It would be so much easier to just use the parametric form.</p>
<p>And by the way, Admin, here is an additional material to your disappointment: we can&#8217;t reference dimensions within f(x) for curves.</p>
<p>I almost feel like doing something about it. Thoughts of API keep coming to mind&#8230;</p>
<p>Eugene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Word of the Day: &#8220;Concinnity&#8221; by fcsuper</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/11/06/word-of-the-day-concinnity/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>fcsuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 02:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/11/06/word-of-the-day-concinnity/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Was the meeting concinnitiatic?  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was the meeting concinnitiatic?  <img src='http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Offsets and Conics by SolidWorm</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/26/offsets-and-conics/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>SolidWorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 12:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/26/offsets-and-conics/#comment-9</guid>
		<description>how offset curves are constructed:
http://www.swgeeks.com/forum/topic/show?id=2064154%3ATopic%3A1044</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how offset curves are constructed:<br />
<a href="http://www.swgeeks.com/forum/topic/show?id=2064154%3ATopic%3A1044" rel="nofollow">http://www.swgeeks.com/forum/topic/show?id=2064154%3ATopic%3A1044</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Ghosts of Configurations Past by Matt Lombard</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/08/20/ghosts-of-configurations-past/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Lombard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 01:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/08/20/ghosts-of-configurations-past/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a great picture! Love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a great picture! Love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Offsets and Conics by Matt Lombard</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/26/offsets-and-conics/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Lombard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 22:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/26/offsets-and-conics/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this! This is the kind of SW trivia I love to learn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this! This is the kind of SW trivia I love to learn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New SolidWorks Where-Used Tool by Administrator</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/08/07/new-solidworks-where-used-tool/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/08/07/new-solidworks-where-used-tool/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m already getting comments &amp; suggestions about being able to interrupt the search.  Unfortunately, due to the nature of the SW Doc Manager, an interrupt in mid-folder is not possible.  I&#039;ve tried.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m already getting comments &#038; suggestions about being able to interrupt the search.  Unfortunately, due to the nature of the SW Doc Manager, an interrupt in mid-folder is not possible.  I&#8217;ve tried.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 2007 sp5.0 = big trouble by fcsuper</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/02/2007-sp50-big-trouble/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>fcsuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/06/02/2007-sp50-big-trouble/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>I remember something about SP5 having issues and that SW 2007 SP4 is prolly the most stable SW version around right now.  Of course, it is also the same version when they introduced the current SNL, which recently brought me no end of headaches when trying to run the 2009 beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember something about SP5 having issues and that SW 2007 SP4 is prolly the most stable SW version around right now.  Of course, it is also the same version when they introduced the current SNL, which recently brought me no end of headaches when trying to run the 2009 beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Synchronous Technology First Blush by idesignhaus</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/05/23/synchronous-technology-first-blush/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>idesignhaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/05/23/synchronous-technology-first-blush/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Nice.  From a &quot;temperamental industrial designer&quot;, I&#039;d recommend skipping the first six minutes of the propaganda.  Perhaps this will kick SW in the pants a bit.
Apple--OK, I&#039;m not nearly as temperamental as those guys or the black T-shirt wearing Frog guys.  But I am wearing a black T-shirt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice.  From a &#8220;temperamental industrial designer&#8221;, I&#8217;d recommend skipping the first six minutes of the propaganda.  Perhaps this will kick SW in the pants a bit.<br />
Apple&#8211;OK, I&#8217;m not nearly as temperamental as those guys or the black T-shirt wearing Frog guys.  But I am wearing a black T-shirt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Synchronous Technology First Blush by fcsuper</title>
		<link>http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/05/23/synchronous-technology-first-blush/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>fcsuper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 21:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://esoxrepublic.com/blog/2008/05/23/synchronous-technology-first-blush/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s funny you mention the iMac.  I believe Apple is one UGS&#039;s biggest customers.  UGS has a good system for handling complex surfaces, but I agree that from the example vidoes, it doesn&#039;t look as though ST handles complex surfaces with the same easy as prismatic features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny you mention the iMac.  I believe Apple is one UGS&#8217;s biggest customers.  UGS has a good system for handling complex surfaces, but I agree that from the example vidoes, it doesn&#8217;t look as though ST handles complex surfaces with the same easy as prismatic features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.075 seconds -->
